<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Numerical Integration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel</link>
	<description>Applied mathematics and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/#comment-6890</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/?page_id=679#comment-6890</guid>
		<description>Hi Pavel!

First of all congrats for your excellent job.

I&#039;m currently using your code to integrate the elements of the stiffness matrix in a solver for Poisson Eq using weak form of Finite Elements Method.

The point is that the code works well when I try to evaluate numerically the integral of a function in &#039;x&#039;, but I don&#039;t manage to integrate a constant (i.e. imagine we want to do gausslegendre(@(x) 1,-1,1). The result of this operation is, as far as I&#039;m concerned, random.

I could neither do this with the original version of quad.m, but after performing some changes to the code now I&#039;m able to do it with a modified ver called myquad.m

Could it be possible to perform the integration of a constant using your code?

Many thanks and congrats again for your work!

Best regards from El Salvador

Pablo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pavel!</p>
<p>First of all congrats for your excellent job.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently using your code to integrate the elements of the stiffness matrix in a solver for Poisson Eq using weak form of Finite Elements Method.</p>
<p>The point is that the code works well when I try to evaluate numerically the integral of a function in &#8216;x&#8217;, but I don&#8217;t manage to integrate a constant (i.e. imagine we want to do gausslegendre(@(x) 1,-1,1). The result of this operation is, as far as I&#8217;m concerned, random.</p>
<p>I could neither do this with the original version of quad.m, but after performing some changes to the code now I&#8217;m able to do it with a modified ver called myquad.m</p>
<p>Could it be possible to perform the integration of a constant using your code?</p>
<p>Many thanks and congrats again for your work!</p>
<p>Best regards from El Salvador</p>
<p>Pablo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel Holoborodko</title>
		<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/#comment-6840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel Holoborodko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/?page_id=679#comment-6840</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you, direct root search with good starting point is much faster than eigen-solving Jacobi matrix.

I have plans to cover all commonly used quadrature, plus to port QuadPack  adaptive integration rules to Matlab. I will release them as a part of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.advanpix.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Multiprecision Computing Toolbox for MATLAB&lt;/a&gt;. 

It already has Gauss-Legendre and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.advanpix.com/2011/11/07/gauss-kronrod-quadrature-nodes-weights/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gauss-Krondrod rules&lt;/a&gt; which is the most important for practical applications since it allows re-use of lower order quadrature nodes in higher order rules. Thus saving on function evaluations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you, direct root search with good starting point is much faster than eigen-solving Jacobi matrix.</p>
<p>I have plans to cover all commonly used quadrature, plus to port QuadPack  adaptive integration rules to Matlab. I will release them as a part of <a href="http://www.advanpix.com/" rel="nofollow">Multiprecision Computing Toolbox for MATLAB</a>. </p>
<p>It already has Gauss-Legendre and <a href="http://www.advanpix.com/2011/11/07/gauss-kronrod-quadrature-nodes-weights/" rel="nofollow">Gauss-Krondrod rules</a> which is the most important for practical applications since it allows re-use of lower order quadrature nodes in higher order rules. Thus saving on function evaluations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/#comment-6839</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/?page_id=679#comment-6839</guid>
		<description>I came across your site while searching for Gauss-Laguerre quadrature. Do you plan to include this in your toolbox? I am currently using the eigen method, but I expect Newton&#039;s method with the initial approximations from Stroud and Secrest would be faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across your site while searching for Gauss-Laguerre quadrature. Do you plan to include this in your toolbox? I am currently using the eigen method, but I expect Newton&#8217;s method with the initial approximations from Stroud and Secrest would be faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/#comment-6824</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/?page_id=679#comment-6824</guid>
		<description>nice job,but I really wants to know how to use it for double integration,if some how it&#039;s doable please let me know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice job,but I really wants to know how to use it for double integration,if some how it&#8217;s doable please let me know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey</title>
		<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/#comment-6685</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/?page_id=679#comment-6685</guid>
		<description>Brilliant  job!!! Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant  job!!! Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edu</title>
		<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/#comment-6632</link>
		<dc:creator>edu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/?page_id=679#comment-6632</guid>
		<description>show the difference between langrange polynomial and newton interpolating polynomial</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>show the difference between langrange polynomial and newton interpolating polynomial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ankit</title>
		<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/#comment-6611</link>
		<dc:creator>ankit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/?page_id=679#comment-6611</guid>
		<description>excellent work....helped me alot..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent work&#8230;.helped me alot..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel Holoborodko</title>
		<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/#comment-6185</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel Holoborodko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/?page_id=679#comment-6185</guid>
		<description>Do you mean quadrature based on “Associated Legendre” polynomials? I don&#039;t know this kind of quadrature. 
Could you be more specific - what task do you solve ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean quadrature based on “Associated Legendre” polynomials? I don&#8217;t know this kind of quadrature.<br />
Could you be more specific &#8211; what task do you solve ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vladan</title>
		<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/#comment-6175</link>
		<dc:creator>vladan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/?page_id=679#comment-6175</guid>
		<description>Do you know where I can find &quot;Abscissae and Weights of Gauss-Legendre Quadrature&quot; for &quot;Associated Legendre&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know where I can find &#8220;Abscissae and Weights of Gauss-Legendre Quadrature&#8221; for &#8220;Associated Legendre&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gowri Priya</title>
		<link>http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-integration/#comment-6007</link>
		<dc:creator>Gowri Priya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 07:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/?page_id=679#comment-6007</guid>
		<description>Thank u very much for giving useful information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank u very much for giving useful information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

